CRITICS THINK PATRIOT ACT IS BAD!
In this Country we have the Patriot Act to locate terrorists and terrorist sympathisers who aid them with money and spying. The majority of Americans realize we are in the midst of a war with Islamist extremists, and accept the Patriot Act for what it is. A line of defense against an enemy dedicated to the eradication of our way of life.
Unfortunately their are many groups who would rather "be free than safe", as was expressed by the statement of ACLU representative, Cindy Whitfield.
Her organization had filed by 2003, 24 lawsuits against the Patriot Act , including one for the CAIR instituted suit against an American airline for violation of the civil rights of disruptive Muslim Imams.
The ACLU has spent millions of dollars on the advertising campaign against the Patriot Act . The effort is called "keep America Safe and Free".

These "quasi-patriotic" groups and organizations try to appear concerned for the rights of the "little guy", but are in fact trying to destroy the rule of law. Too many members and leaders of the ACLU are neo-Communists who are dedicated to the destruction of our way of life, and substituting their Utopian ideals of Marxist socialism.
The ACLU was formed in 1920 by an attorney, Roger Baldwin who had served nine months in jail for refusing to be drafted in WWI, and a feminist who founded the New York branch of the Women's Peace Party. The ACLU members at the beginning were previous members of the National Civil Liberties Bureau. Many were immigrant Marxists and Anarchists.
The ACLU has defended the right of the Klu Klux Klan to hold rallies, and a famous case upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court, they defended Yetta Stromberg vs. The people of the State of California. This case was brought about because Yetta had a Communist Youth Camp in California that flew the Red Communist flag and not the Stars and Stripes.
During WWI President Wilson said: "The authority to exercise censorship is absolutely necessary to the Public safety", and Teddy Roosevelt once said: "anti-war advocates are the enemies at home".

The ACLU and all the other Iraq War protesters like the "She Witch" Cindy Sheehan, should look to Russia where their speech and actions would certainly get them killed or jailed!
The "better red than dead" crowd should read the article printed in the Front Page Magazine on line, that details a forum held to discuss the death of Anna Polikovskaya, shot in her apartment in Moscow 10/7/06, and the murder in Great Britain of former Lt. Col. Alexxander Litvinenko of the Russian Secret Service(formerly KGB) 11/1/06.
The following is an excerpt from a participant, Vladimir Bukovsky. A man who as a Soviet dissident, had spent 12 years in Soviet prison camps, when asked to comment on the deaths of The Journalist Anna and the ex-RFFSS agent, had this to say.
"Consider this: in July of this year, the Russian Duma passed a law authorizing the Russian President to use secret services as "death squads" in order to eliminate "extremists" -- even on the foreign territory (Federal Law of 27 July 2006 N 153-F3).

At the same time, the Duma amended another law, expanding the definition of "extremism" to include anyone "libellously" critical of the current Russian regime (Federal Law of 27 July 2006 N 148-F3).

A stage is set for any critic of Putin's regime here, especially those campaigning against Russian genocide in Chechnya, to have an appointment with a poison-tipped umbrella. According to the statement by the RF Defence Minister Sergei Ivanov, the black list of potential targets is already composed."
And Critics of the Patriot Act think they have it bad?

A VETERANS REACTION TO OBAMA

SO BARRACK OBAMA FEELS IT IS FALSE PATRIOTISM TO WEAR A FLAG PIN ON HIS LAPEL.
This Candidate for President feels he would rather explain how he feels he can make America a better Country than to wear the symbol of this Country on his suit coat lapel.
I believe this is a demonstration of his lame attempt to court anti-war voters away from Senator Clinton, and shows a distinct lack of appreciation for all those men and women who fought and died for the right to display that flag in a free Country.
Everyone should know that the caskets of every brave hero who died for this Country is covered by the American flag before the burial takes place. Soldier, Sailors, Marines, Air Force, Cost Guard, Fireman and Policeman who die in the line of duty have a flag covering their casket which is given to a member of the family at the grave site in honor of their brave and appreciated sacrifice.
Now this "johnny come lately" comes along asking the American people to make him their President. I think not!
No matter what his upbringing includes. He should have an allegiance to the Flag for which we fight and die for. To put his opinions on how to run this Country on the same level as the American flag is the heights of pomposity.
Most of his ideas as expressed on the campaign trail are Socialist, not American values, so I guess I should not be surprised that he refuses to wear the flag pin proudly.
If he won't wear the flag pin for the war effort. He should wear it as a testimonial to the bravery and sacrifice of the Police and Fireman who died in the 9/11 attack by Al Qaeda in New York!
This man may be showing the affects of his Muslim training as a youth or the anti-American preaching of his Black Separatist Ministers preaching in his Chicago home town. No one will ever know what is deep in his mind, but I know one thing. He has no business running for President of the United States if he is not willing to wear a flag pin on his lapel. I hope every veteran, no matter what color of his skin, realizes the apparent affront he demonstrates to their service to Our Country, and to the flag that they all wore proudly on their shoulder patch.

Posted by BILL at Saturday, October 06, 2007 1 comments Links to this post

SOME DEMOCRATS ARE NOTHING BUT ATTACK DOGS

Please pray for our Patriot Armed Forces standing in harm’s way around the world, and for their families, especially those of our fallen Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines and Coast Guardsmen, who have died in defense of American liberty while prosecuting the war with Jihadistan.
With the leftist in Congress and the PresS trying everything they can including supporting lies and character assassination to get the U.S. out of Iraq. The boys and women in uniform in "theater of war" need all our prayers.
The latest attempt to destroy the confidence in American people is the dastardly attack on Rush Limbaugh by Senate Democrat leader Reid(aka hatchet man) and Senator Harkin. Their letter to Clear Channel to remove Rush from the AIR is just another lame attempt to silence a Conservative voice that is heard by over 50 million people every day.
Rush had the courage to "call out" a lying 44 day "washout" at Fort Benning Georgia, a "phony soldier". This man, and I use the word loosely, publicly claimed he was a recipient of the purple heart who served in Iraq as a Ranger , and had witnessed many killings and tortures of Iraqi civilians by the U.S. Rangers.
There is a special place in Hell reserved for people like this lying hypocrite, Jessie MacBeth, but they will have to wait at least until this bum serves his time in jail for falsifying a VA claim an his discharge papers.
This reminds me and I am sure millions of other Americans of the lies told by failed Presidential candidate and present member of the Senate, John Kerry.
The Deamoncrats appear to believe that if you can't defeat a man in the area of public ideas and discourse like Limbaugh, you try to "kill" him. Not literally but by removing his influential voice from radio, so Americans no longer can hear his Conservative views.
I don't listen to Rush because of my busy life style, but in the years that I was on the road a lot I often tuned in his show, and I found it amusing and informative.
Informative is the operative word in Rush's case. Hateful people as I consider most Democrats in Congress don't want the American people to hear the truth. They want to spoon feed US their version of the truth, and too often it is a lie!
The following is a quote from the Seattle Post Intellagencer: "A complaint unsealed Friday in U.S. District Court in Seattle charged him with one count of using or possessing a forged or altered military discharge certificate, and one count of making false statements in seeking benefits from the Veterans Administration…
…Macbeth claimed to have been shot in Iraq and to have suffered post-traumatic stress disorder, LaMont E. Stokes, an agent with the VA’s Office of the Inspector General, wrote in the charging papers. He collected more than $10,400 in benefits to which he was not entitled, Stokes wrote.
Stokes said he interviewed Macbeth in the Pierce County Jail in Tacoma, where he has been serving a sentence for fourth-degree assault, and that Macbeth admitted falsifying the documents because he was homeless and wanted to “sucker” anything he could out of the government."
Enough of the lies Senator Harkin and Reid!

The National Health Scam
As has been the case for the past sixty years or more, the welfare state that President Roosevelt( I never Knew a Russian I didn't like)started, has been expanding while redistributing the wealth from the earners to the non-earners.
The latest version of the Democrat give away plan for votes involves the subject of health Care Coverage for all. By some strange miraculous occurrence, health care has become in the minds of too many Americans a Constitutional if not God given right. To garner more votes and continue the secular socialization of the United States the main plank other than the partially broken one about troop withdrawal from Iraq, is Universal Health Care,and it is just another scam!
The following quote from the Heritage Foundation should shed some light on the latest socialized proposal.
"According to the federal government, thousands of American families are both poor and high-income—simultaneously. These families are considered poor enough to be eligible for the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) program, but under the tax code, they are considered wealthy and so forced to pay the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT). Their ranks may grow if Congress moves forward with plans to expand SCHIP eligibility to wealthier families. The unlikely convergence of these two programs shows how the best intentions of Congress can go astray and result in conflicting priorities. Instead of making this problem worse by expanding SCHIP, Congress should keep SCHIP focused on low-income families and extend the "hold harmless" provision of the AMT" .
SCHIP is a government-funded health insurance originally designed to cover low-income children. Now, however, Democrats want to expand the role of the central government and the size of the SCHIP program dramatically. For instance, they want to increase the income level of those eligible from poverty rates ($16,000 annual income for a family of three, $20,000 for a family of four) to more than double their current levels. Under the Democrat proposal, many families making as much as $80,000 a year would be eligible for this subsidy, meaning that even if they currently have and are able to pay for private health care insurance, they could transfer their coverage to the SCHIP program and essentially have the American taxpayers pay for their health insurance, even though they are well able to themselves.
If this isn't Socialism I am a Martian. Do Most Americans want to go down that path? All you have to do is look at the mess caused by Socialism in Germany, France and England to realize that a free enterprise democratic society like ours is intended to be is the only way to prosper. Yes, we must provide health care for the lame, the blind and the halt as well as the really poor. But we don't have to provide health care coverage to people whose wants are confused with their needs! Too many people want cigarettes and liquor and all other pleasurable wants including that second car, but have no money left to pay for insurance. Must we provide it to those whose ability to pay is compromised by their screwed up priorities? I think not!

[1] [2]

The latest reports on campaign contributions show the Democrats are taking in more money for their election campaign than the Republicans, but these reports don't usually mention who they are from. Recent history has shown that not only billionaires like George Soros and Warren Buffett, and millionaires in Hollywood, but not often reported is the $100,000 contributions from the "seamy side" of life. James Ready, Hong Kong long time associate of the Clintons, $100,000 gift to James McDougal shortly after visiting the Clinton White House in August of 1994, the large cah donation from the Pau family of Daley City, Ca,(a shop keeper), the $850,000 that Hillary had to give back to federal indicted Mr.Norman Hsu, and the 1.2 million dollars Hillary received from a Hollywood Gala in 2000. This "gala" fundraiser for Hillary's Senate campaign is part of a lawsuit filed by the organizer and person who paid for this event, Peter Franklin Paul(convicted felon who was released from federal prison in 1985) for $17 million dollars. His suit alleges the Clinton's defrauded him, and there are charges that the junior Senator from New York committed felonies related to this Hollywood fund raising event. This case is in the hands of a judge appointed by Democratic ex-Governor Gray Davis, so don't expect a ruling or any action until after the 2008 election. If these are mentioned or printed, they are referred to as attempts by right wing radicals out to hurt the Clinton's. Much like the Whitewater scandal that occupied the Courts and special prosecutor from 1979 to 1997. In the years of Whitewater, a poll showed that 60% of Americans believed the Clintons were hiding something! I am sure of it!